Archive for the "Copyright & Law" Category

Little over a week ago rumours were circulating that the MPAA, which consists of seven Hollywood studios, were preparing lawsuits against file sharers of movies, in an action. Then ‘the Register’ claimed their source said that the MPAA were readying to file ‘John Doe’ suits against over 200 people seeking damages up to $150,000 for each movie placed online.

MPAA Start Anti P2P Lawsuits

Today the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) filed the first wave of legal actions against individuals they say are offering pirated copies of films using Internet based peer-to-peer file sharing programs. The film body also said it would soon make available a computer program that sniffs out movie and music files on a users computer as well as any installed file-sharing programs which would be available from their Respect Copyrights website, newly established to educate consumers about copyrights.

The trade group said it would also join with the Video Software Dealers Association to place educational materials in more than 10,000 video stores nationwide. Jason Schultz, an attorney at Electronic Frontier Foundation said the MPAA messages seem contradictory: “They are placing these in locations where people are paying money for movies. They are sending the messages to people who are buying their products.”

MPAA Chief Executive Officer Dan Glickman said in a statement. “The motion-picture industry must pursue legal proceedings against people who are stealing our movies on the Internet. The future of our industry, and of the hundreds of thousands of jobs it supports, must be protected from this kind of outright theft using all available means.”

In an earlier interview with USA Today (Nov 5) Glickman commented, ” We believe we’re losing $3.5 billion yearly. Someone sneaks into a theater with a camcorder, films a movie, puts it online for the world to see for free, and it gets duplicated into DVDs that are getting sold on street corners from New York and Los Angeles to China. If this is allowed to continue, it will sink our industry.”
In the same article it was pointed out by journalist Jefferson Graham that 2003′s box office figures were $9.5 billion, the second biggest in history.

Related Reading

Movie Studios Sue File Traders [Wired.com]
MPAA Touts Lawsuits, New P2P Fighting Software [ZDNet News]
Movie Studios Start Suing Web File Swappers [Reuters.com]
Film Industry Files Wave of Anti-Piracy Lawsuits [TechNewsWorld.com]
P2Pers Ask Supreme Court to Reject RIAA Ban Request [the Register]
Stealing Movies, Why the MPAA Can Afford to Relax [the Register]
New MPAA Boss a Comedian [P2PNet.net]
Exit Valenti [Lessig.org]
A Long Time Ago, in an Industry Far, Far Away [EFF Blogs]
Respect Copyrights [RespectCopyrights.org]
Federation Against Copyright Theft [FACT UK]

Music activist website Downhill Battle are developing their own ‘RIAA-proof’ P2P file sharing client. The ad free Open Source app is based on the multi protocol instant messenger client Gaim and plugs into instant messengers like AIM, ICQ, MSN, Yahoo, or Jabber.

DB say on the projects homepage that, ” Making a program that only geeks can use won’t cut it. The goal, after all, is to keep people out of jail. What’s great about integrating filesharing into an IM client is that the interface will be familiar and non-threatening to everyone. And the interface itself explains the security advantages of the program in simple terms: you share with friends. ”

Downhill Battle-Home Taping
They go onto explain: “We propose an extension to the GAIM chat client that lets users do Gnutella style search & download filesharing, where search requests propagate out to trusted buddies, buddies of buddies, etc. This approach has several advantages. First, people will be more altruistic sharing with friends and won’t be as worried about RIAA/MPAA lawsuits. At the same time, because they can share with friends-of-friends, and friends-of-friends-of-friends, they’ll often be searching a very huge library. This software will be just as simple as an IM client, and it will be easy for people to invite friends (so it spreads virally).”

The software is still in development. Downhill Battle sees P2P/IM-integration with Gaim as a way to stop US P2P file sharers from landing in prison. Proposed legislation is looming in Congress in the US. ( the Intellectual Property Protection Act ) that could see major file sharers jailed if passed.

Gaim is a multi-protocol instant messaging (IM) client for Linux, BSD, MacOS X, and Windows. It is compatible with AIM and ICQ , MSN Messenger, Yahoo!, IRC, Jabber, Gadu-Gadu, SILC, GroupWise Messenger, and Zephyr networks.

Gaim users can log in to multiple accounts on multiple IM networks simultaneously. This means that you can be chatting with friends on AOL Instant Messenger, talking to a friend on Yahoo Messenger, and sitting in an IRC channel all at the same time.

In the light of thousands of lawsuits by music industry watchdogs like the RIAA, file sharers are leaving high profile (and usually spyware laden) file sharing clients like KaZaa in their millions and looking at more ‘secure’ and trusted underground software networks like Mute, Ants and Waste which offer more secure, anonymous protocols.

Related Links

Downhill Battle Labs [DownhillBattle.org]
Downhillbattle.org Bounty For P2P Gaim Plug-in [Slashdot.org]
Block RIAA File Share Jail Plans [P2PNet.net]
Ants P2P A New Approach To File Sharing [Slyck.com]
Trusted Computing, Peer-To-Peer Distribution,and the Economics of Pirated Entertainment [Harvard.edu] 11pg PDF
Jail File Sharers Bill Passed [P2PNet]
Congress Moves To Criminalize P2P [Wired.com]
Instant Messenging Planet [InstantMessengingPlanet.com]
Instant Messenger [Wikipedia.org]

The Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) today appealed a court ruling in which a judge ruled that peer-to-peer file sharing was legal in Canada.

Like its American counterparts the RIAA, the Canadian group is trying to sue file-swappers who are trading copyrighted music online. But in March, a court blocked the label’s trade group from obtaining the identities of alleged file traders, saying that trading music over programs like Kazaa did not appear to be illegal.

The Federal Court of Appeal should set a date for arguments in the appeal in several weeks. CRIA said in its appeal that the lower court should have allowed its cases against alleged copyright infringers to go forward, and reiterated its stance that unauthorized file-sharing constitutes copyright infringement.

Full story:CNet News

Related Reading

Canadian Downloaders Less Likely to Buy Music [MusicBizNews24]

Despite entertainment industry attempts to curb online song and movie swapping with lawsuits and education campaigns, more people than ever are using peer-to-peer services.
BigChampagne, which tracks Internet file sharing, says 8.3 million people were online at any one time in June using unauthorized services like Kazaa and eDonkey — up 19% from 6.8 million in June 2003.

The majority of files being traded were music, BigChampagne says. Porn videos and images were the second-biggest category
Since September, the Recording Industry Association of America has filed 3,500 lawsuits against music sharers who uploaded songs to the Internet. It has settled about 600 of them for fines ranging from $2,000 to $15,000.

Phil Leigh, senior analyst at research firm Inside Digital Media, says the findings are the strongest evidence to date that the lawsuits aren’t scaring people away from so-called P2P programs. “Many just don’t think they’ll be caught,” he says. And users have become savvier about adjusting software so they can’t be traced.

After the initial wave of lawsuits, research firms released studies suggesting people were spending less time on the peer-to-peer services. “What people say and what they do are two different things,” says BigChampagne CEO Eric Garland. “People were not willing to be forthright and admit to something that might get them sued. The fact is, peer-to-peer usage is much more widespread than it was a year ago.”

Full story:USA Today

Related Reading

Poll Shows Opposition to Download Suits [MusicBizNews24]
Music Downloads Overtaken by Movies [MusicBizNews24]
RIAA vs. the People [Electronic Frontier Foundation]

William W. Fisher III is the Hale and Dorr Professor of Intellectual Property Law and Director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School.

Next month Fisher’s book “Promises to Keep: Technology, Law, and the Future of Entertainment” is published by Stanford University Press and promises to provide the first comprehensive, accessible overview of the conflict surrounding music distribution and the emergence of digital communications networks.

The book looks at how changes in the technology used to make and store audio and video recordings,in the last 15 years, combined with the communication revolution associated with the Internet, have generated an extraordinary array of new ways in which music and movies can be produced and distributed. Both the creators and the consumers of entertainment products stand to benefit enormously from the new systems.

And how we have failed thus far to avail ourselves of these opportunities. Instead, much energy has been devoted to interpreting or changing legal rules in hopes of defending older business models against the threats posed by the new technologies. These efforts to plug the multiplying holes in the legal dikes are failing and the entertainment industry has fallen into crisis.

The provocative book chronicles how we got into this mess and presents three alternative proposals each involving a combination of legal reforms and new business models for how we could get out of it.

One of those is ‘An Alternative Compensation System’, which takes up the whole of chapter 6 and is downloadable as a PDF preview, pre publication (August 9th).

Further Reading

Chapter 1:Promises To Keep:Introduction (PDF)
Alternative Compensation Systems [CrossCommons.org]
A Better Way Forward: Voluntary Collective Licensing of Music File Sharing (PDF) [Electronic Frontier Foundation]
A Full, Fair And Feasible Solution To The Dilemma of Online Music Licensing [Quicktopic.com]
Private Copying, Levies and DRMs against the Background of the EU Copyright Framework [Europa]